RE: GATS Update

[Adrian Elliott <aelliott@jump.net>]

Ditto.  We should tell them that we like as big as possible but can make the
layout any size needed.  GATS is still a good show to attend, even with a
small layout.

Adrian.



-----Original Message-----
From: ttat-members-owner@aoot.com [mailto:ttat-members-owner@aoot.com]On
Behalf Of Scott A Smiley
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 9:27 PM
To: ttat-members@aoot.com
Subject: Re: GATS Update


Agree with Ira.

Scott

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:48:59 -0500 "Ira Schneider"
<ira_schneider@Iname.com> writes:
> Ron,
>
> Last year we had a 6 x 3 layout at GATS.  That works out to about
> 35' x 24'.
>
> I hate to give up space, but it might be to our advantage to
> cooperate with them.  It might
> entice them to approve our application for future events.
>
> How about asking them for 34' x 26'?  That would be about the same
> as we had last year.
>
> If we have 30' x 26' we can probably set up a 5 x 3 layout.  If we
> don't do an L-shape
> (and we probably won't with these dimensions), that leaves us room
> for 10 scenery modules
> (since we won't want to put a scenery module behind Ed's bridge).
> At last year's GATS we had 8 modules (5 from Scott, 1 from Adrian,
> and 2 from me).
> I know Adrian has at least 2 more modules.  This can work.
>
> Again, bigger is better, but we could live with a smaller area.  See
> what you can do.
>
>
>
> Ira
>
>
> ------
> TTAT members reflector.
>
>

________________________________________________________________
Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com
------
TTAT members reflector.