Re: GATS Update

[Scott A Smiley <sc.smiley@juno.com>]

Agree with Ira.

Scott

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:48:59 -0500 "Ira Schneider"
<ira_schneider@Iname.com> writes:
> Ron,
> 
> Last year we had a 6 x 3 layout at GATS.  That works out to about 
> 35' x 24'.
> 
> I hate to give up space, but it might be to our advantage to 
> cooperate with them.  It might
> entice them to approve our application for future events.
> 
> How about asking them for 34' x 26'?  That would be about the same 
> as we had last year.
> 
> If we have 30' x 26' we can probably set up a 5 x 3 layout.  If we 
> don't do an L-shape
> (and we probably won't with these dimensions), that leaves us room 
> for 10 scenery modules
> (since we won't want to put a scenery module behind Ed's bridge).
> At last year's GATS we had 8 modules (5 from Scott, 1 from Adrian, 
> and 2 from me).
> I know Adrian has at least 2 more modules.  This can work.
> 
> Again, bigger is better, but we could live with a smaller area.  See 
> what you can do.
> 
> 
> 
> Ira
> 
> 
> ------
> TTAT members reflector.
> 
> 

________________________________________________________________
Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com