[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tearing down the layout at The RailYard
I have to agree with Ira. We need more participate on setup and its
not there. Cancel.
On Jan 15, 2006, at 10:43 PM, Ira Schneider wrote:
> Ron,
>
> In my opinion, there is not enough committed participation to
> participate in the SAMRA show.
>
> There are only three members who have indicated that they will
> participate in setup on Friday evening.
> Jim Reesman says he can participate on Saturday morning, not Friday
> evening. It is very hard
> to set up with only three people, especially since two of the three
> are relatively new members
> who haven't been to many set ups.
>
> Someone, normally the setup Fat Controller, has to design the
> layout and decide what
> modules are required. You shouldn't just say "I would suggest
> taking only enough for a
> basic layout." SAMRA has allocated a 40' x 40' area for the club
> and they are expecting
> us to build an L-shaped layout like last year to fill that area.
> How annoyed are they going
> to be if we show up and just build a small rectangular layout? We
> also have nobody going
> to the show who is bringing scenery modules. The layout would
> consist of only the mainline
> modules (and skyboards).
>
> You need to ask yourself (or perhaps your contact at SAMRA) whether
> they will be
> more annoyed with us setting up a small layout or cancelling out
> two weeks before the show.
>
> I would suggest you consider cancelling the show. We don't have
> enough people for setup,
> they are paying us $150, which means the club will only gain $75
> after paying the
> towing fees, and it is a lot of work for us for minimum benefit.
> (We would have to tear down
> the layout, tow it to San Antonio, set it up, tear it down, tow it
> back to Cedar Park, and set up
> again.
>
> We are reaping tangible benefits from our runs at The RailYard - we
> are gaining new members.
> There is little benefit, and a lot of work, to participate in this
> show, especially with minimum
> participation.
>
> That's my two cents on this issue.
>
> Thanks for listening to my ranting.
>
>
>
>
> Ira
>
>
>
> ------
> TTAT members reflector.
>