Wait a minute, I think we are spinning our wheels over nothing.
Here is the proposed corner curve "plan". (In practice we may find it is slightly different)
>A = O96, O96, O96, O96
>B = 1/2O96, O96, O72, O96, 1/2O96
>C = 1/2O72, O72, O96, O72, 1/2O72
>D = O72, O72, O72, O72
>E = O72, O54, O54, O72
If we run to the bend in the "L" as an "ABCD" configuration then the corner can be set to use the inside four or outside four tracks of the five on the corner. If we use the outside four then the nominal "E" track would be left unused.
Track #1 would use the nominal "D" line of all O72.
Track #2 would use the nominal "C" line
Track #3 would use the nominal "B" line
Track #4 would use the nominal "A" line.
The smallest diameter used would still be O72 IF we go into the inside corner as an "ABCD" configuration.
Ed Weltens
eweltens@apcinc.com
Deputy Program Manager
Advanced Programming Concepts
(512) 327-6795 ext. 270
eweltens@apcinc.com
Sent by: ttat-members-owner@aoot.com02/14/2002 09:43 AM
Please respond to ttat-members
To: ttat-members@aoot.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Corner Modules/Other To Do Items
I have the dimensions at home, but they aren't much bigger than the current corners. I think the main factor for weight would be in the decision to use thicker plywood on future modules.
If we dropped the "D" line than the "E" line could be all O72
Ed
Scott A Smiley <sc.smiley@juno.com>
Sent by: ttat-members-owner@aoot.com02/13/2002 08:26 PM
Please respond to ttat-members
To: ttat-members@aoot.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Corner Modules/Other To Do Items
Just a point about this track configuration. If we turn it around fro an L, then Track 1 would have the 72,54,54,72 radii. It would only be if we went for an L configuration.
I hope this does not get too heavy to carry?
Ed, what are the board dimensions?
Scott
>The five curves would be made up as follows:
>A = O96, O96, O96, O96
>B = 1/2O96, O96, O72, O96, 1/2O96
>C = 1/2O72, O72, O96, O72, 1/2O72
>D = O72, O72, O72, O72
>E = O72, O54, O54, O72
This message has been 'sanitized'. This means that potentially dangerous content has been rewritten or removed. The following log describes which actions were taken.
Sanitizer (start="1013653619"):
Part (pos="1017"):
SanitizeFile (filename="unnamed.txt", mimetype="text/plain"):
Match (rule="2"):
Enforced policy: accept
Part (pos="1582"):
SanitizeFile (filename="unnamed.html", mimetype="text/html"):
Match (rule="2"):
Enforced policy: accept
Rewrote HTML tag: >>_META http-equiv=content-type content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1_<<
as: >>_DEFANGED_META http-equiv=content-type content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1_<<
Rewrote HTML tag: >>_META content="MSHTML 6.00.2712.300" name=GENERATOR_<<
as: >>_DEFANGED_META content="MSHTML 6.00.2712.300" name=GENERATOR_<<
Total modifications so far: 2
Anomy 0.0.0 : sanitizer.pl $Id: Sanitizer.pm,v 1.25 2001/09/04 15:49:11 bre Exp $
This message has been 'sanitized'. This means that potentially
dangerous content has been rewritten or removed. The following
log describes which actions were taken.
Sanitizer (start="1013739886"): Part (pos="1017"): SanitizeFile (filename="unnamed.txt", mimetype="text/plain"): Match (rule="2"): Enforced policy: accept Part (pos="5104"): SanitizeFile (filename="unnamed.html", mimetype="text/html"): Match (rule="2"): Enforced policy: accept Rewrote HTML tag: >>_META http-equiv=content-type content=text/html;charset=us-ascii_<< as: >>_DEFANGED_META http-equiv=content-type content=text/html;charset=us-ascii_<< Rewrote HTML tag: >>_META content="MSHTML 6.00.2712.300" name=GENERATOR_<< as: >>_DEFANGED_META content="MSHTML 6.00.2712.300" name=GENERATOR_<< Rewrote HTML tag: >>_BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid"_<< as: >>_BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr DEFANGED_style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid"_<< Total modifications so far: 3 Anomy 0.0.0 : sanitizer.pl $Id: Sanitizer.pm,v 1.25 2001/09/04 15:49:11 bre Exp $ |